What Was the Transformative Impact of Pope Francis’s Papacy?

Listen to this article

Overview

  • Pope Francis, born Jorge Mario Bergoglio, served as the 266th pope from March 2013 until his death on April 21, 2025, leaving a complex legacy shaped by his progressive reforms and pastoral approach.
  • As the first Jesuit and Latin American pope, he brought a unique perspective, emphasizing humility, social justice, and inclusivity within the Catholic Church.
  • His papacy focused on issues like climate change, migration, and the inclusion of marginalized groups, often sparking both admiration and controversy.
  • Francis’s informal style, marked by accessibility and media engagement, redefined the papacy’s public image, making it more relatable to global audiences.
  • Despite his progressive gestures, he maintained traditional Church doctrines on issues like marriage and priesthood, creating tension between reformers and conservatives.
  • His reforms, including Vatican financial restructuring and synodality, aimed to modernize the Church but also deepened divisions among Catholics worldwide.

Details

Early Life and Election

Jorge Mario Bergoglio, born in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in 1936, emerged from humble beginnings, shaping his lifelong commitment to the poor. His early career included diverse roles, from a chemical technician to a nightclub bouncer, before he entered the Jesuit order in 1958. Ordained in 1969, he rose through the ranks, becoming Archbishop of Buenos Aires in 1998 and a cardinal in 2001. His election as pope in 2013 followed the historic resignation of Pope Benedict XVI, marking a shift from European dominance in the papacy. As the first pope from the Americas and the Jesuit order, Francis symbolized a break from tradition. He chose the name Francis, inspired by St. Francis of Assisi, signaling his focus on poverty and simplicity. From the outset, he rejected the opulence of the Apostolic Palace, opting to live in the modest Casa Santa Marta. His early actions, like paying his own hotel bill post-election, set the tone for a papacy rooted in accessibility. The global Catholic community, numbering 1.4 billion, anticipated a reformer who could address modern challenges. His election was seen as a response to the Church’s need to reconnect with a rapidly changing world.

A New Papal Style

Francis’s papacy was defined by an approachable, pastoral style that contrasted with his predecessors’ formality. He favored simple black shoes over traditional red slippers and drove a modest Ford Focus instead of luxury vehicles. His decision to live in a Vatican guesthouse rather than the papal apartments underscored his rejection of grandeur. Francis was a skilled communicator, often speaking off-the-cuff during press conferences, which endeared him to the media. His famous 2013 remark, “Who am I to judge?” regarding gay priests, became a hallmark of his inclusive tone. These interactions, especially during papal flights, generated headlines and reshaped public perceptions of the papacy. He engaged directly with journalists, greeting them individually on international trips despite physical ailments. This accessibility, however, sometimes led to ambiguity, as his spontaneous comments lacked the precision of formal teachings. Supporters saw his style as a return to the Church’s roots, while critics argued it sowed confusion. His emphasis on humility and simplicity challenged the Church’s hierarchical culture, influencing how future popes might engage with the faithful.

Focus on Social Justice

Francis prioritized social justice, advocating for the poor, migrants, and marginalized communities throughout his 12-year papacy. His 2015 encyclical, Laudato si’, addressed the climate crisis, framing environmental stewardship as a moral imperative. He called for global cooperation to combat climate change, earning praise from world leaders and environmentalists. His outspoken support for migrants, including his 2016 foot-washing of refugees, highlighted their dignity and challenged anti-immigration policies. In a 2025 letter to U.S. bishops, he criticized the Trump administration’s deportation plans as a violation of human dignity. Francis’s focus on economic inequality condemned unbridled capitalism, aligning with Catholic social teaching but drawing conservative ire. His visits to marginalized regions, like Gaza and indigenous communities in Canada, reinforced his commitment to the “peripheries.” Critics argued his political interventions overstepped papal authority, while supporters saw them as prophetic. His social justice advocacy shifted the Church’s priorities away from culture-war issues like abortion. This legacy is likely to influence Catholic engagement with global issues for decades.

Reforming the Vatican

Francis tackled longstanding issues within the Vatican, particularly financial corruption and bureaucratic inefficiency. He established the Secretariat for the Economy to enhance transparency, addressing scandals in the Vatican Bank. His reforms prohibited senior Vatican officials from holding assets in tax havens or accepting lavish gifts. The 2013 investigation into the Vatican Bank uncovered decades of mismanagement, leading to stricter oversight. Francis also streamlined the Roman Curia, the Church’s administrative body, to reduce redundancy. His appointment of a council of advisory cardinals, including non-Europeans, diversified Vatican governance. However, critics noted that his centralization of authority sometimes contradicted his push for synodality, a more collaborative decision-making process. These reforms faced resistance from entrenched Vatican insiders, complicating implementation. Supporters argue that Francis’s financial and administrative changes modernized the Church, while detractors claim they disrupted established structures. His efforts laid the groundwork for a more accountable Vatican, though their long-term success remains uncertain.

Synodality and Church Governance

Francis’s emphasis on synodality aimed to make the Church more inclusive and consultative. He launched a three-year global consultation process, involving tens of thousands of listening sessions with Catholics worldwide. This initiative sought to gauge the faithful’s concerns, revealing strong support for greater roles for women and inclusivity for LGBTQ+ Catholics. The Synod of Bishops, reinvigorated under Francis, encouraged open debate among bishops, a departure from the top-down approach of prior papacies. His 2016 document Amoris Laetitia sparked controversy by allowing flexibility on communion for divorced and remarried Catholics, reflecting his synodal approach. Critics argued this introduced doctrinal ambiguity, while supporters praised its pastoral sensitivity. Francis’s insistence that disagreements strengthened the Church challenged traditional hierarchies. However, the synodal process yielded few concrete changes, frustrating reformers. His governance style empowered laypeople and bishops to voice dissenting opinions, a significant cultural shift. This legacy of dialogue will likely shape future Church decision-making, though its impact depends on his successor.

Inclusivity and Marginalized Groups

Francis sought to make the Church a “field hospital” for the marginalized, emphasizing mercy over judgment. His 2013 comment, “Who am I to judge?” signaled openness toward LGBTQ+ Catholics, though he maintained traditional teachings on marriage and sexuality. The 2023 Fiducia Supplicans declaration, allowing blessings for same-sex couples outside liturgical settings, was a historic step. This move provoked backlash from conservative cardinals, some of whom opposed blessings outright. Francis also condemned laws criminalizing homosexuality, calling them unjust. His outreach to divorced Catholics, through Amoris Laetitia, aimed to reintegrate them into Church life. He advocated for refugees, indigenous peoples, and the poor, apologizing for the Church’s role in historical injustices, like Canada’s residential schools. Critics argued his gestures were symbolic rather than substantive, while supporters saw them as transformative. His inclusivity widened the Church’s appeal but deepened divisions with traditionalists. This tension will challenge his successor to balance unity and reform.

Women in the Church

Francis made strides in elevating women’s roles, though he stopped short of ordaining them as priests or deacons. He appointed women to high-ranking Vatican positions, a first in Church history. In 2016, Barbara Jatta became director of the Vatican Museums, and in 2021, Sister Nathalie Becquart gained voting rights in the Synod of Bishops. Sister Raffaella Petrini’s 2025 appointment as president of the Vatican City Governorate marked another milestone. Francis described the Church as “female” and encouraged parishes to expand women’s leadership roles. His synodal consultation revealed strong lay support for women’s ordination, prompting ongoing discussions about female deacons. Critics, including reformists, argued he moved too slowly, given the Church’s male-dominated structure. Supporters noted that his appointments broke centuries-old barriers. His approach balanced tradition with incremental change, reflecting the Church’s cautious evolution. The question of women’s roles remains a key challenge for the next pope.

Handling Clergy Sexual Abuse

Francis inherited a Church reeling from clergy sexual abuse scandals, and his response was a mixed legacy. He expanded internal protocols for investigating and prosecuting abuse cases, holding bishops accountable for cover-ups. His 2018 apology in Chile acknowledged “serious mistakes” in defending a bishop accused of concealing abuse. He also met with survivors and issued historic apologies, including for the Church’s role in abusing indigenous children in Canada. However, critics, including victims’ advocates, argued he failed to excommunicate abusers or enact systemic reforms. His initial defense of accused clergy, like Bishop Juan Barros, drew widespread criticism. Francis later accepted Barros’s resignation, admitting his error. Supporters credit him with increasing transparency, while detractors say his efforts were inadequate. The abuse crisis remained a stain on his papacy, highlighting the Church’s ongoing struggle. His successor will face pressure to address this issue decisively.

Interfaith and Ecumenical Outreach

Francis prioritized building bridges with other faiths and Christian denominations, reflecting his vision of a united humanity. He visited predominantly Muslim countries, like Iraq and Morocco, fostering interfaith dialogue. His 2019 signing of the Document on Human Fraternity with Grand Imam Ahmed Al-Tayeb promoted peace and coexistence. Francis’s outreach to Orthodox Christians and Protestants aimed to heal centuries-old divisions. His 2016 meeting with asylum seekers, including Muslims and Hindus, underscored his inclusive approach. He once stated, “All religions are paths to God,” a remark that stirred debate among traditionalists. Critics argued his ecumenism diluted Catholic identity, while supporters saw it as a model for global harmony. His interfaith efforts aligned with the Second Vatican Council’s call for unity. This legacy will influence the Church’s role in a pluralistic world. Future popes may build on this foundation to address global conflicts.

Environmental Advocacy

Francis’s environmental advocacy, particularly through Laudato si’, positioned the Church as a moral voice on climate change. The 2015 encyclical linked ecological degradation to poverty, urging collective action. He framed environmental care as a Christian duty, influencing global discussions ahead of the Paris Climate Agreement. His meetings with world leaders, including U.S. President Barack Obama, amplified his message. Francis’s 2025 autobiography, Hope, reiterated his call for sustainable development. Critics, especially conservatives, viewed his environmental focus as a distraction from spiritual matters. Supporters praised his integration of faith and science. His advocacy inspired Catholic institutions to adopt greener practices. This legacy will likely endure, given the growing climate crisis. The next pope will need to address environmental challenges to maintain the Church’s relevance.

Media Engagement and Public Image

Francis’s media engagement transformed the papacy into a global platform. His frequent press conferences, especially on papal flights, generated viral soundbites. The 2013 Time magazine Person of the Year award reflected his widespread appeal. He posed for selfies, wore a clown nose for charity, and maintained an active Vatican social media presence. His warmth and humor contrasted with Benedict XVI’s scholarly reserve. Critics, including some Vatican insiders, accused him of being mercurial, using media to obscure governance flaws. Supporters argued his accessibility humanized the Church, attracting younger Catholics. His media strategy set a new standard for papal communication. Future popes will face pressure to maintain this openness. His public image as the “People’s Pope” will endure as a defining feature of his legacy.

Doctrinal Continuity and Ambiguity

Despite his progressive image, Francis upheld traditional doctrines on marriage, sexuality, and the priesthood. He reaffirmed that marriage is between a man and a woman and opposed women’s ordination. His Fiducia Supplicans declaration clarified that same-sex blessings were not endorsements of marriage. Critics accused him of creating doctrinal ambiguity, particularly through Amoris Laetitia’s flexible approach to communion. Supporters saw his pastoral emphasis as a necessary adaptation to modern realities. His reluctance to change core teachings disappointed liberal Catholics, while conservatives feared he opened the door to future shifts. Francis’s balancing act reflected his Jesuit training, prioritizing discernment over rigid rules. This approach sparked debates that will outlast his papacy. His successor will need to clarify these ambiguities to unify the Church. The tension between tradition and reform remains a central challenge.

Divisions Within the Church

Francis’s reforms deepened divisions between progressive and traditionalist Catholics. His restrictions on the Traditional Latin Mass via Traditionis Custodes (2021) alienated traditionalists, who saw it as an attack on liturgical heritage. Conservative critics, like Cardinal Raymond Burke, accused him of undermining Church authority. Progressives, meanwhile, were frustrated by his refusal to endorse same-sex marriage or women’s ordination. Social media amplified these tensions, polarizing Catholic discourse. Francis’s synodal approach, encouraging open debate, exacerbated factionalism. Supporters argue he exposed necessary fault lines for the Church’s growth. Critics claim he left a fragmented Church on the verge of schism. His papacy highlighted the challenge of leading a diverse global institution. The next conclave will determine whether his vision endures or is curtailed.

Global Influence and Political Engagement

Francis wielded significant influence on global issues, often engaging directly with political leaders. His 2015 U.S. Congress address, the first by a pope, called for compassion and solidarity. He mediated tensions, like the 2014 U.S.-Cuba rapprochement, earning diplomatic praise. His criticism of Trump’s immigration policies sparked public clashes, underscoring his willingness to confront power. Francis’s advocacy for peace, particularly in Gaza and Ukraine, aligned with his moral vision. Critics argued his political interventions blurred the line between spiritual and secular authority. Supporters saw him as a prophetic voice in a turbulent world. His global influence expanded the Church’s role in international affairs. This legacy will challenge future popes to balance diplomacy and doctrine. His engagement set a precedent for the papacy’s geopolitical role.

Shaping the College of Cardinals

Francis appointed 110 of the 138 cardinals eligible to vote in the next conclave, diversifying the Church’s leadership. He elevated cardinals from underrepresented regions, like Africa and Asia, reducing European dominance. Figures like Cardinals Luis Antonio Tagle (Philippines) and Fridolin Ambongo Besungu (DR Congo) are potential successors. This shift reflects the growing Catholic populations in the Global South. Critics argue his appointments stacked the deck for a progressive successor, though Vatican alliances are fluid. Supporters see it as a correction to centuries of Eurocentrism. His reshaping of the College ensures his influence on the next papacy. The conclave’s outcome will test the durability of his vision. A conservative successor could pivot away from his reforms. This strategic legacy underscores Francis’s long-term impact.

Challenges for the Next Pope

The next pope will inherit a Church shaped by Francis’s reforms and divisions. Maintaining his accessible style while clarifying doctrinal ambiguities will be critical. The clergy abuse crisis demands stronger action to restore trust. Balancing inclusivity with traditional teachings will test the new pontiff’s leadership. Environmental and migration issues, central to Francis’s papacy, require ongoing attention. The synodal process, if continued, could further democratize Church governance or deepen factionalism. A conservative pope might reverse Francis’s progressive gestures, like same-sex blessings. A progressive successor could entrench his reforms, risking further division. The conclave’s unpredictability, noted by historians, adds uncertainty. Francis’s legacy will frame these challenges, shaping the Church’s path forward.

Enduring Legacy

Francis’s papacy will be remembered for its transformative yet divisive impact. His humility, social justice advocacy, and media engagement humanized the Church. Reforms like Vatican financial transparency and synodality modernized its structures. His inclusivity, particularly toward marginalized groups, broadened the Church’s appeal. However, his ambiguity on doctrine and restrictions on traditional practices alienated conservatives. The clergy abuse crisis, though addressed, remained unresolved. His global influence, from climate advocacy to diplomacy, elevated the papacy’s moral voice. Divisions within the Church, amplified by social media, pose ongoing challenges. His reshaping of the College of Cardinals ensures long-term influence. Ultimately, Francis redefined the papacy as a pastoral, outward-facing institution, leaving a complex legacy for his successor to navigate.

Scroll to Top